SP 800-53Ar1 FPD Assessment Procedure Catalog, with SP 800-53r3 Security Controls
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
CM-1
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-1 |
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES
|
CM-1.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy and procedures; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with configuration management and control responsibilities].
|
CM-1.2 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy and procedures; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with configuration management and control responsibilities].
|
CM-2
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-2 |
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
|
CM-2.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing the baseline configuration of the information system; enterprise architecture documentation; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-2(1) |
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
|
CM-2(1).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines:
- (ii) the organization reviews and updates the baseline configuration of the information system
- in accordance with the organization-defined frequency;
- when required due to organization-defined circumstances; and
- as an integral part of information system component installations and upgrades.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing the baseline configuration of the information system; information system architecture and configuration documentation; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with configuration change control responsibilities].
|
CM-2(2) |
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
|
CM-2(2).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization employs automated mechanisms to maintain an up-to-date, complete, accurate, and readily available baseline configuration of the information system.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing the baseline configuration of the information system; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms implementing baseline configuration maintenance].
|
CM-2(3) |
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
|
CM-2(3).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization retains older versions of baseline configurations as deemed necessary to support rollback.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing the baseline configuration of the information system; information system architecture and configuration documentation; historical copies of baseline configurations; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-2(4) |
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
|
CM-2(4).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization develops and maintains a list of software programs not authorized to execute on the information system; and
- (ii) the organization employs an allow-all, deny-by-exception authorization policy to identify software allowed to execute on the information system.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing the baseline configuration of the information system; list of software programs not authorized to execute on the information system; information system architecture and configuration documentation; security plan; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-2(5) |
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
|
CM-2(5).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization develops and maintains a list of software programs authorized to execute on the information system; and
- (ii) the organization employs a deny-all, permit-by-exception authorization policy to identify software allowed to execute on the information system.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing the baseline configuration of the information system; list of software authorized to execute on the information system; information system architecture and configuration documentation; security plan; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-2(6) |
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
|
CM-2(6).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing the baseline configuration of the information system; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms implementing baseline configuration environments].
|
CM-3
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-3 |
CONFIGURATION CHANGE CONTROL
|
CM-3.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization determines the types of changes to the information system that are configuration controlled;
- (ii) the organization approves configuration-controlled changes to the system with explicit consideration for security impact analyses;
- (iii) the organization documents approved configuration-controlled changes to the system;
- (iv) the organization retains and reviews records of configuration-controlled changes to the system;
- (v) the organization audits activities associated with configuration-controlled changes to the system;
- (vi) the organization defines:
- the configuration change control element (e.g., committee, board) responsible for coordinating and providing oversight for configuration change control activities;
- the frequency with which the configuration change control element convenes; and/or;
- configuration change conditions that prompt the configuration change control element to convene.
- (vii) the organization coordinates and provides oversight for configuration change control activities through the organization-defined configuration change control element that convenes at the organization-defined frequency and/or for any organization-defined configuration change conditions.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system configuration change control; information system architecture and configuration documentation; security plan; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with configuration change control responsibilities].
|
CM-3(1) |
CONFIGURATION CHANGE CONTROL
|
CM-3(1).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines the time period after which approvals that have not been received for proposed changes to the information system are highlighted; and
- (ii) the organization employs automated mechanisms to:
- document proposed changes to the information system;
- notify designated approval authorities;
- highlight approvals that have not been received by the organization-defined time period;
- inhibit change until designated approvals are received; and
- document completed changes to the information system.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system configuration change control; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; automated configuration control mechanisms; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms implementing configuration change control].
|
CM-3(2) |
CONFIGURATION CHANGE CONTROL
|
CM-3(2).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization tests, validates, and documents changes to the information system before implementing the changes on the operational system.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system configuration change control; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with configuration change control responsibilities].
|
CM-3(3) |
CONFIGURATION CHANGE CONTROL
|
CM-3(3).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization employs automated mechanisms to implement changes to the current information system baseline; and
- (ii) the organization deploys the updated baseline across the installed base.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system configuration change control; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; automated configuration control mechanisms; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms implementing changes to the information system baseline].
|
CM-3(4) |
CONFIGURATION CHANGE CONTROL
|
CM-3(4).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization requires an information security representative to be a member of the configuration change control element as defined by the organization in CM-3.1 (vi).
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system configuration change control; security plan; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with configuration change control responsibilities].
|
CM-4
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-4 |
SECURITY IMPACT ANALYSIS
|
CM-4.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization analyzes changes to the information system to determine potential security impacts prior to change implementation.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing security impact analysis for changes to the information system; security impact analysis documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with responsibilities for determining security impacts prior to implementation of information system changes].
|
CM-4(1) |
SECURITY IMPACT ANALYSIS
|
CM-4(1).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization analyzes new software in a separate test environment before installation in an operational environment; and
- (ii) the organization, when analyzing new software in a separate test environment, looks for security impacts due to flaws, weaknesses, incompatibility, or intentional malice.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing security impact analysis for changes to the information system; security impact analysis documentation; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; information system test and operational environments; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with responsibilities for determining security impacts prior to implementation of information system changes].
|
CM-4(2) |
SECURITY IMPACT ANALYSIS
|
CM-4(2).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization, after the information system is changed, checks the security functions to verify that the functions are:
- implemented correctly;
- operating as intended; and
- producing the desired outcome with regard to meeting the security requirements for the system.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing security impact analysis for changes to the information system; security impact analysis documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with responsibilities for determining security impacts prior to implementation of information system changes].
|
CM-5
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-5 |
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS FOR CHANGE
|
CM-5.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization defines, documents, approves, and enforces physical and logical access restrictions associated with changes to the information system.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing access restrictions for changes to the information system; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with logical access control responsibilities; organizational personnel with physical access control responsibilities].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Change control process and associated restrictions for changes to the information system].
|
CM-5(1) |
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS FOR CHANGE
|
CM-5(1).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization employs automated mechanisms to enforce access restrictions and support auditing of the enforcement actions.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing access restrictions for changes to the information system; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms implementing access restrictions for changes to the information system].
|
CM-5(2) |
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS FOR CHANGE
|
CM-5(2).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines the frequency for conducting audits of information system changes; and
- (ii) the organization conducts audits of information system changes in accordance with the organization-defined frequency and when indications so warrant to determine whether unauthorized changes have occurred.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing access restrictions for changes to the information system; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; security plan; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-5(3) |
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS FOR CHANGE
|
CM-5(3).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines critical software programs that the information system will prevent from being installed if such software programs are not signed with a recognized and approved certificate; and
- (ii) the information system prevents the installation of organization-defined critical software programs that are not signed with a certificate that is recognized and approved by the organization.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing access restrictions for changes to the information system; list of critical software programs to be prohibited from installation without an approved certificate; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; security plan; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Information system mechanisms preventing installation of software programs not signed with an organization-approved certificate].
|
CM-5(4) |
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS FOR CHANGE
|
CM-5(4).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines information system components and system-level information requiring enforcement of a two-person rule for information system changes; and
- (ii) the organization enforces a two-person rule for changes to organization-defined information system components and system-level information.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing access restrictions for changes to the information system; security plan; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel responsible for enforcing a two-person rule for system changes].
|
CM-5(5) |
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS FOR CHANGE
|
CM-5(5).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization limits information system developer/integrator privileges to change hardware, software, and firmware components and system information directly within a production environment;
- (ii) the organization defines the frequency for reviews and reevaluations of information system developer/integrator privileges; and
- (iii) the organization reviews and reevaluates information system developer/integrator privileges in accordance with the organization-defined frequency.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing access restrictions for changes to the information system; security plan; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with logical access control responsibilities; organizational personnel with physical access control responsibilities].
|
CM-5(6) |
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS FOR CHANGE
|
CM-5(6).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization limits privileges to change software resident within software libraries (including privileged programs).
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing access restrictions for changes to the information system; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-5(7) |
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS FOR CHANGE
|
CM-5(7).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines safeguards and countermeasures to be employed by the information system if security functions (or mechanisms) are changed inappropriately; and
- (ii) the information system automatically implements organization-defined safeguards and countermeasures if security functions (or mechanisms) are changed inappropriately.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing access restrictions for changes to the information system; information system design documentation; information system architecture and configuration documentation; change control records; information system audit records; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Information system implementing safeguards and countermeasures for inappropriate changes to security functions].
|
CM-6
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-6 |
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
|
CM-6.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines security configuration checklists to be used to establish and document mandatory configuration settings for the information system technology products employed;
- (ii) the organization-defined security configuration checklists reflect the most restrictive mode consistent with operational requirements;
- (iii) the organization establishes and documents mandatory configuration settings for information technology products employed within the information system using organization-defined security configuration checklists;
- (iv) the organization implements the security configuration settings;
- (v) the organization identifies, documents, and approves exceptions from the mandatory configuration settings for individual components within the information system based on explicit operational requirements; and
- (vi) the organization monitors and controls changes to the configuration settings in accordance with organizational policies and procedures.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing configuration settings for the information system; security plan; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; security configuration checklists; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with security configuration responsibilities].
|
CM-6(1) |
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
|
CM-6(1).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization employs automated mechanisms to centrally manage, apply, and verify configuration settings.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing configuration settings for the information system; information system design documentation; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; security configuration checklists; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms implementing the centralized management, application, and verification of configuration settings].
|
CM-6(2) |
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
|
CM-6(2).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines configuration settings that, if modified by unauthorized changes, initiate the automated mechanisms to be employed to respond to such changes; and
- (ii) the organization employs automated mechanisms to respond to unauthorized changes to organization-defined configuration settings.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing configuration settings for the information system; security plan; information system design documentation; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; security configuration checklists; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms implementing responses to unauthorized changes to configuration settings].
|
CM-6(3) |
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
|
CM-6(3).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization incorporates detection of unauthorized, security-relevant configuration changes into the organization's incident response capability; and
- (ii) the organization ensures that such detected events are tracked, monitored, corrected, and available for historical purposes.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing configuration settings for the information system; procedures addressing incident response planning; information system design documentation; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; incident response plan; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with security configuration responsibilities; organization personnel with incident response planning responsibilities].
|
CM-6(4) |
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
|
CM-6(4).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the information system (including modifications to the baseline configuration) demonstrates conformance to security configuration guidance (i.e., security checklists), prior to being introduced into a production environment.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing configuration settings for the information system; information system design documentation; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; security configuration checklists; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with security configuration responsibilities].
|
CM-7
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-7 |
LEAST FUNCTIONALITY
|
CM-7.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines for the information system prohibited or restricted:
- functions;
- ports;
- protocols; and
- services;
- (ii) the organization configures the information system to provide only essential capabilities; and
- (iii) the organization configures the information system to specifically prohibit or restrict the use of organization-defined:
- functions;
- ports;
- protocols; and/or
- services.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing least functionality in the information system; security plan; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; security configuration checklists; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Information system for disabling or restricting functions, ports, protocols, and services].
|
CM-7(1) |
LEAST FUNCTIONALITY
|
CM-7(1).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines the frequency of information system reviews to identify and eliminate unnecessary:
- functions;
- ports;
- protocols; and/or
- services; and
- (ii) the organization reviews the information system in accordance with organization-defined frequency to identify and eliminate unnecessary:
- functions;
- ports;
- protocols; and/or
- services.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing least functionality in the information system; security plan; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; security configuration checklists; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with responsibilities for identifying and eliminating unnecessary functions, ports, protocols, and services on the information system].
|
CM-7(2) |
LEAST FUNCTIONALITY
|
CM-7(2).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization develops and maintains one or more of the following specifications to prevent software program execution on the information system:
- a list of software programs authorized to execute on the information system;
- a list of software programs not authorized to execute on the information system; and/or
- rules authorizing the terms and conditions of software program usage on the information system; and
- (ii) the organization employs automated mechanisms to prevent software program execution on the information system in accordance with the organization-defined specifications.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing least functionality in the information system; security plan; information system design documentation; specification of preventing software program execution; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms preventing software program execution on the information system].
|
CM-7(3) |
LEAST FUNCTIONALITY
|
CM-7(3).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines registration requirements for:
- ports;
- protocols; and
- services; and
- (ii) the organization ensures compliance with organization-defined registration requirements for:
- ports;
- protocols; and
- services.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing least functionality in the information system; security plan; information system configuration settings and associated documentation; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-8
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-8 |
INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENT INVENTORY
|
CM-8.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines information deemed necessary to achieve effective property accountability; and
- (ii) the organization develops, documents, and maintains an inventory of information system components that:
- accurately reflects the current information system;
- is consistent with the authorization boundary of the information system;
- is at the level of granularity deemed necessary for tracking and reporting;
- includes organization-defined information deemed necessary to achieve effective property accountability; and
- is available for review and audit by designated organizational officials.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system component inventory; security plan; information system inventory records; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-8(1) |
INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENT INVENTORY
|
CM-8(1).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization updates the inventory of information system components as an integral part of component:
- installations;
- removals; and
- information system updates.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system component inventory; information system inventory records; component installation records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with information system installation and inventory responsibilities].
|
CM-8(2) |
INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENT INVENTORY
|
CM-8(2).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization employs automated mechanisms to maintain an up-to-date, complete, accurate, and readily available inventory of information system components.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system component inventory; information system design documentation; information system inventory records; component installation records; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms implementing information system component inventory management].
|
CM-8(3) |
INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENT INVENTORY
|
CM-8(3).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization defines the frequency of employing automated mechanisms to detect the addition of unauthorized components/devices into the information system;
- (ii) the organization employs automated mechanisms, in accordance with the organization-defined frequency, to detect the addition of unauthorized components/devices into the information system; and
- (iii) the organization disables network access by such components/devices or notifies designated organizational officials.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system component inventory; security plan; information system design documentation; information system inventory records; component installation records; change control records; other relevant documents or records].
- Test: [SELECT FROM: Automated mechanisms for detecting unauthorized components/devices on the information system].
|
CM-8(4) |
INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENT INVENTORY
|
CM-8(4).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization includes in property accountability information for information system components, a means for identifying by name, position, or role, individuals responsible for administering those components.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system component inventory; information system inventory records; component installation records; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-8(5) |
INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENT INVENTORY
|
CM-8(5).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization verifies that all components within the authorization boundary of the information system are either inventoried as a part of the system or recognized by another system as a component within that system.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system component inventory; security plan; information system inventory records; component installation records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with information system inventory responsibilities; organizational personnel with responsibilities for defining information system components within the authorization boundary of the system].
|
CM-8(6) |
INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENT INVENTORY
|
CM-8(6).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization includes assessed component configurations and any approved deviations to current deployed configurations in the information system component inventory.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing information system component inventory; information system design documentation; information system inventory records; component installation records; other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with inventory management and assessment responsibilities for information system components].
|
CM-9
FAMILY: CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
|
CLASS: OPERATIONAL
|
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
|
CM-9 |
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
|
CM-9.1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if:
- (i) the organization develops, documents, and implements a configuration management plan for the information system that:
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing configuration management planning; security plan; other relevant documents or records].
|
CM-9(1) |
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
|
CM-9(1).1 |
ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVE:
Determine if the organization assigns responsibility for developing the configuration management process to organizational personnel that are not directly involved in system development.
|
- POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND OBJECTS:
- Examine: [SELECT FROM: Configuration management policy; configuration management plan; procedures addressing responsibilities for configuration management process development; security plan other relevant documents or records].
- Interview: [SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with responsibilities for configuration management process development].
|
Source